On the appropriate and inappropriate uses of probability distributions in climate projections and some alternatives

verfasst von
Joel Katzav, Erica L. Thompson, James Risbey, David A. Stainforth, Seamus Bradley, Mathias Frisch
Abstract

When do probability distribution functions (PDFs) about future climate misrepresent uncertainty? How can we recognise when such misrepresentation occurs and thus avoid it in reasoning about or communicating our uncertainty? And when we should not use a PDF, what should we do instead? In this paper, we address these three questions. We start by providing a classification of types of uncertainty and using this classification to illustrate when PDFs misrepresent our uncertainty in a way that may adversely affect decisions. We then discuss when it is reasonable and appropriate to use a PDF to reason about or communicate uncertainty about climate. We consider two perspectives on this issue. On one, which we argue is preferable, available theory and evidence in climate science basically exclude using PDFs to represent our uncertainty. On the other, PDFs can legitimately be provided when resting on appropriate expert judgement and recognition of associated risks. Once we have specified the border between appropriate and inappropriate uses of PDFs, we explore alternatives to their use. We briefly describe two formal alternatives, namely imprecise probabilities and possibilistic distribution functions, as well as informal possibilistic alternatives. We suggest that the possibilistic alternatives are preferable.

Organisationseinheit(en)
Institut für Philosophie
Externe Organisation(en)
University of Queensland
London School of Economics and Political Science
CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere
University of Warwick
University of Leeds
Typ
Artikel
Journal
CLIMATIC CHANGE
Band
169
ISSN
0165-0009
Publikationsdatum
25.11.2021
Publikationsstatus
Veröffentlicht
Peer-reviewed
Ja
ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete
Globaler Wandel, Atmosphärenwissenschaften
Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung
SDG 13 – Klimaschutzmaßnahmen
Elektronische Version(en)
http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/112978/1/On_the_appropriate_and_inappropriate_uses_of_PDFs_share.pdf (Zugang: Offen)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03267-x (Zugang: Geschlossen)