Marine and coastal cultural ecosystem services

Knowledge gaps and research priorities

authored by

João Rodrigues Garcia, Alexis J. Conides, Susana Rodriguez Rivero, Saša Raicevich, Pablo Pita, Kristin M. Kleisner, Cristina Pita, Priscila F.M. Lopes, Virginia Roldán Alonso, Sandra S. Ramos, Dimitris Klaoudatos, Luís Outeiro, Claire Armstrong, Lida Teneva, Stephanie Stefanski, Anne Böhnke-Henrichs, Marion Kruse, Ana I. Lillebø, Elena M. Bennett, Andrea Belgrano, Arantza Murillas, Isabel Pinto Sousa, Benjamin Burkhard, Sebastián Villasante

Abstract

Cultural ecosystem services (CES) reflect peoples’ physical and cognitive interactions with nature and are increasingly recognised for providing non-material benefits to human societies. Whereas coasts, seas, and oceans sustain a great proportion of the human population, CES provided by these ecosystems have remained largely unexplored. Therefore, our aims were (1) to analyse the state of research on marine and coastal CES, (2) to identify knowledge gaps, and (3) to pinpoint research priorities and the way forward. To accomplish these objectives, we did a systematic review of the scientific literature and synthesised a subset of 72 peer-reviewed publications. Results show that research on marine and coastal CES is scarce compared to other ecosystem service categories. It is primarily focused on local and regional sociocultural or economic assessments of coastal ecosystems from Western Europe and North America. Such research bias narrows the understanding of social-ecological interactions to a western cultural setting, undermining the role of other worldviews in the understanding of a wide range of interactions between cultural practices and ecosystems worldwide. Additionally, we have identified clusters of cooccurring drivers of change affecting marine and coastal habitats and their CES. Our systematic review highlights knowledge gaps in: (1) the lack of integrated valuation assessments; (2) linking the contribution of CES benefits to human wellbeing; (3) assessing more subjective and intangible CES classes; (4) identifying the role of openocean and deep-sea areas in providing CES; and (5) understanding the role of non-natural capital in the co-production of marine and coastal CES. Research priorities should be aimed at filling these knowledge gaps. Overcoming such challenges can result in increased appreciation of marine and coastal CES, and more balanced decision-supporting mechanisms that will ultimately contribute to more sustainable interactions between humans and marine ecosystems.

External Organisation(s)

Universidad de Santiago de Compostela
Hellenic Centre for Marine Research
Centro Tecnológico del Mar
Italian National Institute for Environmental Protection and Research (ISPRA)
National Research Council Italy (CNR)
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
University of Aveiro
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
Fisheries and Food Institute
CONICET
Universidade do Porto
University of Hull
University of British Columbia
University of Tromso
Conservation International
Duke University
Wageningen University and Research
Foundation for Sustainable Development
Kiel University
McGill University
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Swedish Institute for the Marine Environment (SIME)
AZTI Fundazioa
Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF)

Type

Review article

Journal

One Ecosystem

Volume

2

Publication date

2017

Publication status

Published

Peer reviewed

Yes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG 14 - Life Below Water

Electronic version(s)

https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.2.e12290 (Access: Open)