Ethical Reasoning During a Pandemic
Results of a Five Country European Study
- authored by
- S. B. Johnson, F. Lucivero, B. M. Zimmermann, E. Stendahl, G. Samuel, A. Phillips, N. Hangel
- Abstract
Introduction: There has been no work that identifies the hidden or implicit normative assumptions on which participants base their views during the COVID-19 pandemic, and their reasoning and how they reach moral or ethical judgements. Our analysis focused on participants’ moral values, ethical reasoning and normative positions around the transmission of SARS-CoV-2.Methods: We analyzed data from 177 semi-structured interviews across five European countries (Germany, Ireland, Italy, Switzerland and the United Kingdom) conducted in April 2020.Results: Findings are structured in four themes: ethical contention in the context of normative uncertainty; patterns of ethical deliberation when contemplating restrictions and measures to reduce viral transmission; moral judgements regarding “good” and “bad” people; using existing structures of meaning for moral reasoning and ethical judgement.Discussion: Moral tools are an integral part of people’s reaction to and experience of a pandemic. ‘Moral preparedness’ for the next phases of this pandemic and for future pandemics will require an understanding of the moral values and normative concepts citizens use in their own decision-making. Three important elements of this preparedness are: conceptual clarity over what responsibility or respect mean in practice; better understanding of collective mindsets and how to encourage them; and a situated, rather than universalist, approach to the development of normative standards.
- External Organisation(s)
-
University of Oxford
University of Basel
Technical University of Munich (TUM)
University College Dublin
King's College London
KU Leuven
- Type
- Article
- Journal
- AJOB Empirical Bioethics
- Volume
- 13
- Pages
- 67-78
- No. of pages
- 12
- ISSN
- 2329-4515
- Publication date
- 2022
- Publication status
- Published
- Peer reviewed
- Yes
- ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Health(social science), Philosophy, Health Policy
- Sustainable Development Goals
- SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
- Electronic version(s)
-
https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2022.2040645 (Access:
Open)