On the appropriate and inappropriate uses of probability distributions in climate projections and some alternatives

authored by
Joel Katzav, Erica L. Thompson, James Risbey, David A. Stainforth, Seamus Bradley, Mathias Frisch
Abstract

When do probability distribution functions (PDFs) about future climate misrepresent uncertainty? How can we recognise when such misrepresentation occurs and thus avoid it in reasoning about or communicating our uncertainty? And when we should not use a PDF, what should we do instead? In this paper, we address these three questions. We start by providing a classification of types of uncertainty and using this classification to illustrate when PDFs misrepresent our uncertainty in a way that may adversely affect decisions. We then discuss when it is reasonable and appropriate to use a PDF to reason about or communicate uncertainty about climate. We consider two perspectives on this issue. On one, which we argue is preferable, available theory and evidence in climate science basically exclude using PDFs to represent our uncertainty. On the other, PDFs can legitimately be provided when resting on appropriate expert judgement and recognition of associated risks. Once we have specified the border between appropriate and inappropriate uses of PDFs, we explore alternatives to their use. We briefly describe two formal alternatives, namely imprecise probabilities and possibilistic distribution functions, as well as informal possibilistic alternatives. We suggest that the possibilistic alternatives are preferable.

Organisation(s)
Institute of Philosophy
External Organisation(s)
University of Queensland
London School of Economics and Political Science
CSIRO Oceans & Atmosphere
University of Warwick
University of Leeds
Type
Article
Journal
CLIMATIC CHANGE
Volume
169
ISSN
0165-0009
Publication date
25.11.2021
Publication status
Published
Peer reviewed
Yes
ASJC Scopus subject areas
Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science
Sustainable Development Goals
SDG 13 - Climate Action
Electronic version(s)
http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/112978/1/On_the_appropriate_and_inappropriate_uses_of_PDFs_share.pdf (Access: Open)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03267-x (Access: Closed)