Dryopteris juxtapostia Root and Shoot

Determination of Phytochemicals; Antioxidant, Anti-Inflammatory, and Hepatoprotective Effects; and Toxicity Assessment

verfasst von
Abida Rani, Muhammad Uzair, Shehbaz Ali, Muhammad Qamar, Naveed Ahmad, Malik Waseem Abbas, Tuba Esatbeyoglu
Abstract

An estimated 450 species of

Dryopteris in the Dryoperidaceae family grow in Japan, North and South Korea, China, Pakistan, and Kashmir. This genus has been reported to have biological capabilities; however, research has been conducted on

Dryopteris juxtapostia. Therefore, with the present study, we aimed to exploring the biological potential of

D. juxtapostia root and shoot extracts. We extracted dichloromethane and methanol separately from the roots and shoots of

D. juxtapostia. Antioxidant activity was determined using DPPH, FRAP, and H

2O

2 assays, and anti-inflammatory activities were evaluated using both in vitro (antiurease activity) and in vivo (carrageenan- and formaldehyde-induced paw edema) studies. Toxicity was evaluated by adopting a brine shrimp lethality assay followed by determination of cytotoxic activity using an MTT assay. Hepatoprotective effects of active crude extracts were examined in rats. Activity-bearing compounds were tentatively identified using LC-ESI-MS/MS analysis. Results suggested that

D. juxtapostia root dichloromethane extract exhibited better antioxidant (DPPH, IC

50 of 42.0 µg/mL; FRAP, 46.2 mmol/g; H

2O

2, 71% inhibition), anti-inflammatory (urease inhibition, 56.7% at 50 µg/mL; carrageenan-induced edema inhibition, 61.7% at 200 µg/mL; formaldehyde-induced edema inhibition, 67.3% at 200 µg/mL), brine shrimp % mortality (100% at 1000 µg/mL), and cytotoxic (HeLa cancer, IC

50 of 17.1 µg/mL; prostate cancer (PC3), IC

50 of 45.2 µg/mL) effects than

D. juxtapostia root methanol extract.

D. juxtapostia shoot dichloromethane and methanol extracts exhibited non-influential activity in all biological assays and were not selected for hepatoprotective study.

D. juxtapostia root methanol extract showed improvement in hepatic cell structure and low cellular infiltration but, in contrast the dichloromethane extract, did not show any significant improvement in hepatocyte morphology, cellular infiltration, or necrosis of hepatocytes in comparison to the positive control, i.e., paracetamol. LC-ESI-MS/MS analysis showed the presence of albaspidin PP, 3-methylbutyryl-phloroglucinol, flavaspidic acid AB and BB, filixic acid ABA and ABB, tris-desaspidin BBB, tris-paraaspidin BBB, tetra-flavaspidic BBBB, tetra-albaspidin BBBB, and kaempferol-3-

O-glucoside in the dichloromethane extract, whereas kaempferol, catechin, epicatechin, quinic acid, liquitrigenin, and quercetin 7-

O-galactoside in were detected in the methanol extract, along with all the compounds detected in the dichloromethane extract. Hence,

D. juxtapostia is safe, alongside other species of this genus, although detailed safety assessment of each isolated compound is obligatory during drug discovery.

Organisationseinheit(en)
Institut für Lebensmittelwissenschaft und Humanernährung
Molekulare Lebensmittelchemie und -entwicklung
Externe Organisation(en)
Bahauddin Zakariya University
Khwaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology (KFUEIT)
Multan Medical and Dental College (MMDC)
Typ
Artikel
Journal
Antioxidants
Band
11
ISSN
2076-3921
Publikationsdatum
27.08.2022
Publikationsstatus
Veröffentlicht
Peer-reviewed
Ja
ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete
Lebensmittelwissenschaften, Molekularbiologie, Physiologie, Biochemie, Klinische Biochemie, Zellbiologie
Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung
SDG 3 – Gute Gesundheit und Wohlergehen
Elektronische Version(en)
https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11091670 (Zugang: Offen)