Climate Models and the Irrelevance of Chaos

verfasst von
Corey Nathaniel Dethier
Abstract

Philosophy of science has witnessed substantial recent debate over the existence of a structural analogue of chaos, which is alleged to spell trouble for certain uses of climate models. The debate over the analogy can and should be separated from its alleged epistemic implications: chaos-like behavior is neither necessary nor sufficient for small dynamical misrepresentations to generate erroneous results. The kind of sensitivity that matters in epistemology is one that induces unsafe beliefs, and the existence of a structural analogue to chaos is better seen as an explanation for known safety failures than as providing evidence for unknown ones.

Organisationseinheit(en)
Institut für Philosophie
Typ
Artikel
Journal
Philosophy of Science
Band
88
Seiten
997-1007
Anzahl der Seiten
11
ISSN
0031-8248
Publikationsdatum
12.2021
Publikationsstatus
Veröffentlicht
Peer-reviewed
Ja
ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete
Philosophie, Verlauf, Wissenschaftsgeschichte und -philosophie
Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung
SDG 13 – Klimaschutzmaßnahmen
Elektronische Version(en)
https://doi.org/10.1086/714705 (Zugang: Geschlossen)